Prepare a target list
- Without PASSport
- Open or print individual timetables and manually align them against the school day.
- With PASSport
- Load the approved export and save a filtered pastoral cohort in one visual view.
Critical Developments · Product 04
See where target pupils should be, period by period.
Period-by-period pastoral tracking.

The operational problem
Pastoral teams often need a fast answer to a narrow question: where is this pupil expected during this period? The danger begins when that operational question expands into a general appetite for pupil data. PASSport is built around the narrower task—and around the discipline required to keep it narrow.
Non-standard placements sit outside the ordinary timetable view.
Staff cross-reference lists, individual timetables and messages during a live pastoral check.
A selected-period register shows the authorised cohort's expected alternative placement, current operational state and source freshness.
Recurring provision, one-off sessions and pickups are recorded inconsistently.
The working timetable cannot explain which arrangement applies on this date.
Every-week, Week A, Week B, one-off and pickup records retain effective dates, duration, location, staff reference and movement instructions.
A timetable change overwrites the regular pattern.
History disappears and the next occurrence may be changed by accident.
Date-specific exceptions cancel or move one session without rewriting the recurring placement.
A check produces another informal message rather than owned follow-up.
Important actions are acknowledged late, escalated unclearly or never deliberately closed.
Handover records support ownership, acknowledgement, escalation, review, closure and reopening with dated history.
A broad pupil export is imported because it is available.
The register accumulates casework and personal data it does not need.
PASSport admits only the minimum directory and timetable references needed for current placements and unresolved handovers.
Capability map
PASSport is a period-by-period operational programme, not a pretty printout of the normal timetable.
Current or selected period, expected placement, outcome, filters, detail and source freshness for the active authorised index.
Up to twelve teaching periods, break and lunch bands, year-specific time variants and a confirmed Week A anchor where required.
Five-day individual and permission-filtered cohort views combining ordinary context with alternative sessions and exceptions.
Every week, Week A, Week B and dated sessions with effective dates, location, type, staff code and movement instructions.
Momentary, timed or full-period staff contacts kept distinct from a full placement.
Cycle-aware clash checks, safe edits, date-specific cancellation or moves and history-preserving limits.
Arrived, location confirmed, not seen or cancelled for the exact placement and school date, with attribution and history.
Routine or urgent follow-up with owner, optional due date, acknowledgement, escalation, review, closure and reopen states.
School-owned day structures and reference pools, validated CSV staging and a minimum-data read-only MIS projection behind live gates.
Bounded reports, spreadsheet-safe exports, saved views, provenance and approval-led retention that preserves linked operational history.
The present build uses fictional data. Deployment, live MIS delivery, school retention decisions and live pupil-data approval remain separate.
Working sequence
The timetable states what is expected. A dated check records what was observed. The handover owns whatever must happen next.
Expected placement, effective date, recurrence and movement instruction.
Arrived, location confirmed, not seen or cancelled for this exact session.
A named owner acknowledges, reviews, closes or reopens the follow-up.
Product roadmap
See the current period, expected location, operational outcome and source freshness for the authorised cohort.
Record recurring and one-off alternative sessions, effective dates, collection details and checked conflicts.
Combine ordinary and alternative sessions for one pupil or a permission-filtered working group.
Record a rapid outcome, assign follow-up, acknowledge it, escalate when necessary and close it deliberately.
Validate, preview, reconcile and roll back a controlled CSV or minimum-data MIS projection.
Permission-filtered provision reports, safe exports, audit and approval-led retention rather than silent deletion.
How it differs
Official published descriptions checked 27 August 2026. Feature sets change; procurement requires direct verification with each vendor.
Bromcom foregrounds timetable access through its Attendance module, dashboard and lesson views. PASSport does not replace that broad MIS authority. It narrows the view to pupils with non-standard placements and unresolved handovers, joining recurrence, pickups, exceptions and follow-through across an authorised cohort.
CLM foregrounds off-site alternative-provision management across schools, providers and local authorities, joining attendance, safeguarding, progress, finance and provider oversight. PASSport serves a narrower school-operational question that can include on-site interventions, therapy, meetings and pickups.
The practical difference
The point is faster period checks and fewer timetable look-ups when pastoral teams coordinate support for pupils on non-standard timetables.
Measure it properly. Any published time-saving figure will come from the same task measured before and during a school pilot.
Editorial perspective
Pastoral teams often need a fast answer to a narrow question: where is this pupil expected during this period? The danger begins when that operational question expands into a general appetite for pupil data. PASSport is built around the narrower task—and around the discipline required to keep it narrow.
The school day is arranged in periods; pastoral work is frequently arranged in interruptions. A pupil has alternative provision, an intervention, therapy, a meeting or a pickup. A colleague needs to know whether absence from an ordinary lesson is expected.
PASSport brings the permitted non-standard placement into a period-first register so the answer can be checked without reconstructing the day from fragments. That sounds simple. It is simple. The difficulty is preventing a simple tool from becoming something else.
The useful pastoral answer is often a narrow one. Good software resists the urge to make it wider.
PASSport records where a pupil should be according to a stated placement. It can record an operational outcome, but it is not live location tracking and does not replace attendance, safeguarding or behaviour systems.
Expected in describes the authority of the schedule. Seen in describes a dated observation. Not seen records an operational check, not a conclusion about motive, conduct or safety.
The ordinary timetable belongs to the school's source system. PASSport owns the alternative placement that applies in a stated period: effective dates, recurrence, location, type, movement instructions, exceptions and operational history.
Conflicts must be honest. An every-week placement and a Week A placement cannot silently occupy the same slot. A one-off change should not rewrite the recurring schedule.
There is a persistent fantasy in school technology that usefulness increases with the number of fields imported. PASSport works in the opposite direction. Sensitive casework does not belong in the operational register simply because it exists elsewhere.
This is not privacy purchased at the price of utility. It is utility clarified by purpose: the placement, movement instruction, current operational state and route for follow-up.
Some questions end when the expected location is confirmed. Others require acknowledgement, escalation, review or closure. PASSport keeps those handovers owned and visible without inventing a free-standing pastoral case file.
PASSport is not an answer to every question about a pupil. Its value lies in answering one urgent question well, preserving the difference between schedule and observation, and making the next responsibility clear.
Security · UK GDPR
Security and data protection are part of the product boundary. Certification, school approval and live use remain separate decisions.
Define the minimum fields needed for each job, validate imports and avoid copying wider MIS records into the product without a clear purpose.
Use role-based permissions, least-privilege defaults and auditable administrative actions for data that should not be visible to every member of staff.
Treat encryption in transit and at rest, tested backups, retention controls and reliable deletion as baseline technical requirements.
Prepare a clear data map, processing agreement, subprocessor list, retention schedule, technical-measures summary and practical DPIA support before contracting.
School-facing boundary: the school will still need an appropriate lawful basis, privacy information, access policy, retention decisions and—where the risk requires it—a DPIA. The supplier’s job is to make those decisions informed, documented and technically enforceable.